Age Wave Implications US Coins US Coin Collectors

National Parks

Thanks for Visiting. We Have Some Amazing National Parks Product Information For You, So Please Have a Look Around!

More Great Information on National Parks:

A Symbol of the Fragility of our National Parks by MIKE SELVON

Our national parks have developed a reputation for several appealing features. Incredible monuments, gorgeous scenery, and intriguing wildlife are but a few of the many attractions of our parks.

The unspoiled majesty of our national parks is a living treasure and it could be difficult to choose one or two to visit at any given time. Why not start with two of the more popular sites; The General Grant Tree and Kings Canyon.

The General Grant Tree towers over 260 feet above the Grant Grove, the largest remaining natural Sequoia grove in the world. The circumference of its trunk at its widest is over 90 feet alone.

The true size is difficult to imagine but, to put it in perspective, the General Grant Tree is a little shorter than the Statue of Liberty standing on her pedestal and the trunk is bigger than the Oval Office at the White House.

This two thousand Year Old Sequoia tree also has the designation of being the third largest Sequoia in the world, the second largest of all our national parks (the largest found also found in the Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park but not nearly as picturesque), and our nation's Christmas Tree.

The General Grant Tree can be found at the north entrance of the park along Route 180 leading to Grant's Grove Village.

Despite the impressive size of the General Grant Tree, the true centerpiece of the Kings Canyon National Parks is Kings Canyon. Kings Canyon has the distinction of being the deepest canyon in North America.

At 8000 feet from its highest point to the Kings River cutting through its middle, it is deeper than even the Grand Canyon though it lacks the sheer width that makes the Grand Canyon more impressive.

The only way to fully enjoy most of the attractions at the Kings Canyon National Park is by hiking. It is the only mode of transportation that is allowed. Cars will never get in your way, so plan on thoroughly enjoying the exquisite Zumwalt Meadow and Cedars Grove, two of the most appealing attractions found in the park.

Other notable places to visit in the Kings Canyon National Park include the Roaring River Falls, a section of the Kings River that tumbles down the rocky side of the Kings Canyon.

Big Stump Basin is another location to visit, where remnants of fallen giant Sequoia trees lay dead from timber operations from the early 1900's as a reminder of mankind's lasting effects on our environment.

All of our national parks teach us valuable lessons. Both the Kings Canyon and Sequoia National Parks show us how mighty our forests can be - when humans do not negatively affect them.

It would be a shame to lose these magnificent trees and have our future genteration only read about them in books. Protecting the environment is a must for all of us today, so that we may sustain nature and beauty for as long as we can.

National Parks can be an intriguing and beautiful experience for anyone. Learn more about the fragility of our national parks at Mike Selvon portal. While you are there leave is a comment at our National Park blog, and receive your FREE gift.

Article Source: http://www.earticlesonline.com/Article/A-Symbol-of-the-Fragility-of-our-National-Parks/188036

Are there any people that opposes national parks?

I'm eagerly awaiting the National Parks: Americas best idea" presenentation on TV but it got me wondering, I have NEVER seen anyone oppose national parks or say we should urbanize them all (i've seen conservatives say that we should drill for oil in them or slash their budjet, but that isn't really opposeing them) So my question is: is there anyone in the United States that thinks we should urbanize the parks?

Without being able to read other people's minds, I'd have to say no. Generally, the parks are held in pretty high esteem. Generally.

I think there are some parks in urbans settings that folks in those cities debate. Not that they really have a choice, since the land was federal before the park was created, and not theirs. But the debates usually center around how much revenue the parks bring into the cities versus how much they could bring in if the land was converted to other uses. These debates are seen mostly in the most dense cities, and are rarely public debates, but rather golf course and bar room debates. No one is interested in paving Yellowstone or Yosemite and putting up any high-rises anytime soon, but debates over moving Independence Hall or better uses for the land of Golden Gate arise regularly. Luckily, so far, people's sense of history, patriotism, or whatever keep these hypothetical debates in the bar or the golf cart, and are rarely aired publicly.